Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/13 Stars
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 (talk) 18:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 13 Stars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Newspaper publishing company doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP- lacks coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:58, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:22, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:22, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:22, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.